Pinpoint Facilitation process and equipment
Entry BoardFast TrackSupportQ and ATerms
Order | Confirm Confirm order
0
£0.00
  
Pinpoint Privilege Club

Pinpoint Facilitation
Process and Workshops
Why is Pinpoint Facilitation more effective?
Graphic Facilitation System and Workshops
Buy Facilitation equipment
Hire Facilitation Equipment
Case Studies
Pinpoint Facilitation Centre
Catalogue and Pricelist
Environment
Secure site
Copyright

© Copyright 2005-2010.
Pinpoint™ and Pinpoint Facilitation™
are Trademarks. Trademarks and all Website design and content are the copyright of Pinpoint Facilitation Limited, Chalgrove, Oxfordshire, UK.
All rights reserved.

Resolving Conflict Track*Resolving Conflict Track

To assist two teams to work together more effectively

Resolving Conflict
Scenario
To assist two teams to work more effectively together, for instance:-
  • IT specialists (25 people) writing programmes for Store Management
  • Store Managers (35 people) from 200 stores across Europe, who have to use the software written by the IT Specialists.
Issue
The opinions of the 2 groups differ significantly:-
  • Team 1 complain of poor information being provided and, even if it is given, it is always too late.
  • Team 2 complain of software being set up too late, not what they asked for and containing many useless details that need their time to fill in.
Objective
To identify existing issues between our two teams and make plans to improve our working together.

Step 1 : Entry Board (Whole Group)

Name Location What I really want from this session is:-
     

Step 2: Trailer : (Whole Group)
"How well do we work as a team?"
Scale: "Peaches and cream" through to "Kippers and Custard"

Step 3 : Divide into 2 groups.
Mix up both teams and both Groups working the same track. Work in tables of 6.
Card call question 1
"What are the key signals that two teams like ours are pulling together to achieve corporation goals?"
Process. Each person writes cards; each table hands in top 5 cards from the table:-

  • Ask for missing categories
  • Prioritise
Matrix
Key signals
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
                       

Identify top 6 issues
Guide Sub-Groups to fix (Dumb Waiter):-

  • Causes. Solutions. Counter arguments. Actions. or . . .
  • Signs of success:-
    • Symptoms of failure to be watchful for
    • Action to start off
Step 4 : Individual Action Plans
Name To make things better, I will . . . with . . . when starting . . .
     
     

Step 5 : Break. Management team to choose 6-10 issues that could be the topic for Continuous Improvement Teams (issues they are prepared to invest in)

Step 6 : Reconvene into one Group

Step 7 : Continuous Improvement Action Plan
Managers can choose/offer lead role to selected people before team works through.

Key issues to manage:-

By (leader) with (team) Who else to invite 1st planning meeting
       
       

© Copyright 2005-2010. Pinpoint™ and Pinpoint Facilitation™ are Trade Marks.
Trade Marks and all Website design & content are the copyright of
Pinpoint Facilitation Limited, Chalgrove, Oxfordshire UK. All rights reserved.